A competency model is a set of competencies that employees should demonstrate as they go about their jobs, as determined by the organization. Each competency is represented by a set of behaviors. The number of competencies in a model varies, as does the number of behaviors per competency. The competencies and behaviors serve as guides rather than unbreakable rules. The purpose of having such a model is to heighten the signal and eliminate the noise in the ongoing pursuit of organizational goals, so people do more things well and fewer things poorly.
Here is an example of a competency we’ll call “Communicate Effectively”:
- Proactively provide information to people who need it
- Provide information to teammates or customers in a helpful way
- Adapt communication methods to the situation and listeners
- Listen carefully to others’ perspectives
- Communicate truthfully
Let’s take a quick look at the problems that behaviors like these (the signal) prevent (the noise). Here is the above list again, paired with the problems they prevent.
Desired behaviors (signal) | Problems they reduce (noise) |
Proactively provide information to people who need it | Sit on information that teammates would benefit from |
Provide information to teammates or customers in a helpful way | Provide scads of data without highlighting relevant aspects |
Adapt communication methods to the situation and listeners | Communicate information by email when it inevitably raises questions and requires discussion |
Listen carefully to others’ perspectives | Dismiss others’ contributions that could have been valuable, or make decisions in a vacuum |
Communicate truthfully | Mislead others |
Since competency models address what the organization wants its employees to do, they are often incorporated, to some extent, into hiring methods, performance review templates, training, and individualized development. Models also vary in how simple or elaborate they are. They can include components such as rating scales, predesigned interview questions for each competency, different behaviors for different organizational levels, and other add-ons.
How to Enhance Acceptance of a New Model During Design
1. Involve people in its creation to heighten its relevance.
The more people you involve, the better. There are several angles to this. Get executives involved to make sure that the model targets the strategic directions in which leaders want the company to move. That will also enhance leadership support, which is crucial to the success of any endeavor. To be clear, leadership support here does not mean that someone said something nice at a kickoff meeting. It means that leaders continually monitor progress and reinforce the expectation that people use the system.
Similarly, involve as many end users as possible through interviews, focus groups, and surveys. This will enhance both the relevance and credibility of the materials created. Also, represent as many different functions as possible rather than focusing on just a few key functions. A lack of involvement may result in materials that don’t feel relevant to end users. For example, if the home office designs competencies and behaviors without adequate input from the field, field employees will recognize the lack of realism, leading to reduced usage.
2. Build in end-user editing capability.
In this context, end users can be individual employees or entire functions. Each may encounter common situations in which editing can enhance relevance. Here are a few examples of how a behavior may be edited for use by a sales function.
Original “generic” behavior | Behavior after editing for use in sales |
Provide on-hand information to people who would benefit from it | Share customer research and insights with cross-functional partners |
Adapt communications to the needs of the audience | Relate product characteristics to customers’ needs |
Respond quickly to teammates’ requests | Respond quickly to customers’ requests for proposals |
One subtlety of end-user editing is that the content must be in an editable format! There are many ways to do this, such as providing the content in a Word file. The alternative is presenting it in a printed format that users cannot edit without retyping it from scratch. This results in competencies or behaviors that are close, but not quite right, and may discourage use.
3. Prioritize simplicity and user-friendliness.
This can be a double-edged sword. What one person perceives as elaborate and full of valuable components, another may perceive as complex and cluttered. As with any endeavor, learn the needs and wants of the organization and its employees, and make a sound, balanced decision.
This can affect many variables. For example, the organization can settle on eight competencies, twenty competencies with subtle distinctions, or anywhere in between. There can be six behaviors per competency, twelve behaviors per competency, or anywhere in between. Some people will appreciate all the nuances, while others will find them dizzying. Similarly, the language can be articulate and academic or expressed in laypeople’s terms.
“Success is largely determined not by the merits of the project but by the thoroughness of its implementation. How many good initiatives fail because nobody followed up? Or because training was an afterthought?”
How to Enhance Acceptance of a New Model During the Early Stages of Rollout
A quick thought before proceeding: Depending on the scope or complexity of your model, the rollout can occur in phases. For example, you might implement the model in Phase 1, the interviewing component in Phase 2, and so on. Or you might use it in one department for a quarter, iron out some kinks, and then expand.
1. Emphasize the benefits.
A competency model provides guidance about how people should go about their jobs. Many people will think, “Why should I do this? I am already doing my job well.” To be fair, many don’t have evidence to the contrary unless the culture is feedback-rich (and few are). To address this, emphasize the reasons for implementing the model and its benefits.
There are several ways to approach this. One is to describe why the endeavor was pursued in the first place. If you created a competency model, someone earlier made that decision for a good reason. What was that reason? Another approach is to use the above analogy of signal and noise. All accomplished athletes have coaches for exactly that reason. No matter how well anyone (or any group) performs, there is always room for improvement. Further, it is neither cool nor profitable to be just “adequate.” A third approach is to highlight the benefits of improving at specific competencies. “If we focus more on customers, we will have greater customer retention, which can bring in X additional dollars.” “If we solve problems more efficiently, we estimate that Y dollars in costs could be avoided.” And so forth.
I’d suggest emphasizing the bottom-line benefits and doing so credibly. Too many people are wary of passing fads that come and go because they weren’t really useful to begin with.
2. Conduct helpful training.
Such training should address both why and how. We discussed “why” above. Training should explain that competencies and behaviors are guidelines rather than absolute rules, and that judgment is still needed. It should also cover the importance of customizing items to make them most useful. If behavior-based interviews or development guides are part of the rollout, dedicated training should be conducted to guide their use. I should mention my bias: Videos and documents strike me as poor imitations of real training. If there is no practice and no opportunity for discussion, execution will be compromised. Maybe there is a place for them, but competency model implementation is not that place.
3. Secure regular reinforcement from leaders.
The higher up, the better. What type of reinforcement? I’m not a fan of having some higher-up make a five-minute cameo at a kickoff meeting. This signals that they don’t care about it and are just there for show. Regular reinforcement means leaders ask about it, talk about it, and encourage its use in ongoing interactions and forums. But how do you make that happen? By getting them involved in the original design so that it addresses their goals. You want them to care, not to pretend they care. Why? People care about what their bosses care about. Managers care about, and act on, what their managers care about.
How to Enhance Acceptance of a New Model After the Rollout
1. Refresh it periodically.
A year or two after the initial rollout, some things will have changed. New executives will bring new paradigms and priorities. New customers will cause processes to evolve. Some practices will catch on and take root, while others fade away. Some processes will become more sophisticated, warranting more detailed coverage in your model.
This means adding content, but it also means editing or deleting it. If people feel that the model has become cluttered, they will stop using it. Updates can be informed by simple surveys about what is missing or has become obsolete, with follow-up deep dives as appropriate. Note also that if there are structured interview questions, development guides, performance rating scales, or other materials derived from the model, they should be updated to reflect the changes.
2. Share best practices and success stories.
This can be done through staff meetings, emails, newsletters, or other forums. There are many variations on this theme. For example, “Function X started using competency Y and accomplished Z.” Or, “John has been using Behavior X for a few months and discovered that…” This reinforces use of the model in general and highlights successes that others can replicate. The forum for doing so should be one that is accepted in the organization.
There are ways to estimate financial gains from a competency model. One way is to look at metrics already in use and see whether anything has changed since the model’s implementation. Most importantly, confirm with subject matter experts that use of the model (probably through specific behaviors or competencies) seems to have influenced those metrics. (Half of all metrics will improve just by chance.) Another way is to follow up on specific success stories where there appears to be a link to significant bottom-line results. For example, if someone describes developing an innovation, look for its financial consequences. Be rigorous, seek out expert judgments, and don’t mislead anyone.
3. Have an owner.
Refreshing the model and sharing best practices can only happen if someone is responsible for doing so. Sounds obvious? Once something has been implemented, it is tempting to check the box and move on. That gets the implementation done, but not the maintenance.
In addition to the above, the owner should follow up with users periodically to monitor and address challenges. Is more training needed, and if so, on what? Are certain competencies going unused? Are people customizing as intended, and if not, why not? Just to reiterate, the competency model was designed because of the benefits it brings, presumably to the bottom line. Maintaining the model similarly affects those benefits, positively or negatively.
Closing Thoughts
Many of the above tips apply to the rollout of almost anything, so they are probably common sense to any OD practitioner: executive sponsorship, overcommunication, and so forth. But the guidance above adapts these principles specifically to the rollout of competency models.
One takeaway from the above, consistent with other rollouts, is that success is largely determined not by the merits of the project but by the thoroughness of its implementation. How many good initiatives fail because nobody followed up? Or because training was an afterthought?
What competency modeling has going for it is that it is indeed a bottom-line endeavor, not just pretty lipstick. Whoever signed off on it in the first place recognized this. It normally shouldn’t take much legwork to articulate those bottom-line connections, whether before or after that decision or during the rollout.
About the Author
Perry Alter, Ph.D.
Dr. Perry Alter is an experienced competency modeling specialist who has worked with organisations across multiple industries to develop practical, customised competency models. His work translates the science of effective management practices into accessible, actionable tools, including structured interviews, professional development guides, and 360-degree assessments.
He is the author of Competency Modeling for the Not-Yet Expert and has authored or co-authored articles published in HR Future, CEO Refresher, Recruiting Trends, and Diversity Executive, covering topics such as teamwork, leadership development, employee selection, diversity, and measuring training effectiveness.
Perry holds a PhD in Educational Psychology and Research. Outside his professional work, he is an enthusiastic Sudoku solver, enjoys challenging physical workouts, and loves spending quiet moments reading with his dog.
He is a member and expert speaker of the Globlal Institute of Organization Devevelopment Network (GIODN),
